Chapter 17 - RICHARD ATTACKS MY CAPACITYThe DNA issue stopped helping him.

So Richard shifted.
Classic.
His lawyers argued Dad’s underlying concern was not paternity alone.
It was whether I could manage voting responsibility after my accident.
I had lost a leg.
Not a brain.
Still, they produced emails where Dad worried about my recovery.
Ethan cannot be expected to take on new governance burdens this year.
True.
Then:
We need an interim voting solution.
Also true.
Richard argued Dad wanted him to serve temporarily.
Possible.
But the genuine signed amendment did not give him that power.
The existing trust already allowed the independent trustee to handle votes during incapacity or transition.
Richard’s replacement page had bypassed that trustee and put proxy control directly into his hands.
That distinction mattered.
The amputation became more than insult.
Richard had turned temporary physical recovery into an argument for political control.
At one deposition, his lawyer asked:
“Were you taking opioid pain medication when Samuel died?”
“Yes.”
“Did it affect concentration?”
“Sometimes.”
“Were you prepared to exercise voting rights over a company of this size?”
“No.”
The lawyer paused.
Maybe expecting shame.
I continued:
“That is why the trust had an independent trustee. It is not why Richard gets my father’s shares.”
May you like
Correct answer.
Because true.
Related Stories